The Short-Term Mortgage Problem

Tom Locke - Insolvency Trustee in London, Ontario
April 21, 2025

Short-Term Mortgage Issues

One of the most pressing—and least acknowledged—issues is the widespread use of short-term mortgage terms. These are mortgages with rates fixed for just 1 to 7 years, after which the interest rate is renegotiated. While this benefits lenders by allowing them to adjust rates to market conditions, it leaves homeowners dangerously exposed.

When rates rise, as they inevitably do, borrowers are hit with significantly higher monthly payments. Many are caught off guard, having budgeted based on the original terms. This kind of payment shock can cause real hardship, especially for households already stretched thin. It also introduces instability into the housing market, as large numbers of borrowers simultaneously face escalating costs.

There’s a simple and necessary solution: short-term mortgages should be eliminated altogether. Mortgages should be long-term, fixed-rate agreements that offer predictability, not ticking time bombs. A home should be a place to build a life—not a high-risk financial instrument with a reset button.

Mortgages as a Gateway to Over-Leverage

Another disturbing evolution in the mortgage market is the use of home equity to consolidate other forms of debt—credit cards, personal loans, even auto financing. On paper, this might look responsible: trading multiple high-interest payments for one lower-rate mortgage payment. But the reality is far more dangerous.

When homeowners roll unsecured debt into their mortgage, they’re effectively turning short-term, often unsecured obligations into long-term, secured debt. This increases financial risk substantially. If they default, it’s not just a ding to their credit—they could lose their home. The stakes are existential.

Even worse, this practice encourages excessive borrowing by making it appear more manageable than it truly is. It distorts risk perception and promotes a false sense of financial health.

The Real Estate Price Spiral

All of this—short-term mortgages, debt consolidation, and the financialization of homeownership—has contributed to a runaway real estate market. Easy access to mortgage money, with little restriction on how it’s used, inflates buyer budgets and drives up demand. Sellers respond accordingly, and prices surge beyond what working families can realistically afford.

The housing market, once grounded in local income levels and basic human needs, has become a speculative arena. Homes are no longer priced for living—they’re priced for leveraging. And that shift is locking out entire generations from ownership, feeding wealth inequality, and creating a growing sense of economic despair.

What Needs to Happen Now

To restore sanity to the housing market and protect consumers, we need real reform—now. Here are three essential steps:

  1. Eliminate Short-Term Mortgages: All residential mortgages should have long-term fixed interest rates, ideally locked for the full amortization period. This would restore stability, prevent payment shocks, and remove the risk of speculative rate resets.
  2. Legislate an Interest Rate Ceiling: There must be a cap on how much lenders can charge on residential mortgages. This would provide essential protection for consumers and prevent predatory practices during times of financial stress.
  3. Ban the Use of Residential Mortgages for Non-Housing Debt: Home equity should only be used to purchase or improve the property itself—not to pay off unrelated debts. This would reduce over-leverage, lower systemic risk, and help cool the runaway housing market.

A Critical Crossroads

The warning signs are flashing. We are building a housing system on the shaky ground of short-term speculation, financial overreach, and misguided incentives. The longer we delay reform, the deeper the consequences will run—not just for individual homeowners, but for the broader economy.

We need to rethink what a mortgage is for. It should not be a tool for chasing gains, consolidating risk, or navigating rate cycles. It should be a safe, stable foundation on which people build their lives.

If we don’t act now, the next housing crisis won’t be a surprise. It will be the predictable result of the choices we’re making today.


Would you like to include data or recent examples to support these arguments in a follow-up post? Or turn this into a policy brief or op-ed?